{"id":4815,"date":"2024-08-22T13:27:51","date_gmt":"2024-08-22T18:27:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/?p=4815"},"modified":"2024-08-22T13:27:51","modified_gmt":"2024-08-22T18:27:51","slug":"almagest-book-xi-jupiters-periodic-motions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/08\/almagest-book-xi-jupiters-periodic-motions\/","title":{"rendered":"Almagest Book XI: Jupiter&#8217;s Periodic Motions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Before moving on, Ptolemy describes how he arrived at the periodic motions of Jupiter, beginning with an ancient observation.<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[I]t is declared that in the $45^{th}$ year of the calendar of Dionysius, on Parthenon $10$, that the planet Jupiter occulted the southernmost [of the two] Aselli at dawn. Now, the moment [of the observation] is in the $83^{rd}$ year from the death of Alexander, Epiphi [XI] $17\/18$ in the Egyptian calendar [$240$ BCE Sept. $3\/4$], dawn.<\/p>\n<p>For that time, we find the longitude of the mean sun as $9;56\u00ba$ into Virgo. But, the star called &#8216;the southern Asellus&#8217;<span id='easy-footnote-1-4815' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/08\/almagest-book-xi-jupiters-periodic-motions\/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-4815' title='\u03b4 Cnc\/'><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/span> among those surrounding the nebula in Cancer had a longitude, at the time of our observation [of it], of $11 \\frac{1}{3}\u00ba$ into Cancer. Hence, obviously, its longitude at the observation in question was $7;33\u00ba$ [into Cancer], since to the $378$ years between the observations corresponds to [a precessional motion of] $3;47\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the longitude of Jupiter at that moment (since it had occulted the star) was also $7;33\u00ba$ into Cancer. Similarly, since the apogee was $11\u00ba$ into Virgo in our times, it must have had a longitude of $7;13\u00ba$ into Virgo at the observation. Hence, it is clear that the distance of the apparent planet from the then apogee of the eccentre was $300;20\u00ba,$ while the distance of the mean sun from that same apogee was $2;43\u00ba.$<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Using this information, Ptolemy sketches a new diagram:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4816\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11.jpg?resize=300%2C282&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"282\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11.jpg?resize=300%2C282&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11.jpg?resize=1024%2C962&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11.jpg?resize=768%2C722&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11.jpg?resize=1536%2C1443&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11.jpg?resize=2048%2C1924&amp;ssl=1 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In this diagram, we have the line of apsides as $\\overline{AG}$. Points $Z$, $D$, and $E$ remain as the equant, center of mean distance, and observer respectively.<\/p>\n<p>The epicycle is centered on $B$ with Jupiter at $\\Theta$. The mean sun is at $L.$ We&#8217;ll create $\\overline{ZB}$ which gets extended to the opposite side of the epicycle at $H$, as well as lines $\\overline{DB}$, and $\\overline{E \\Theta}$.<\/p>\n<p>We then drop perpendiculars from $Z$ onto $\\overline{DB}$ at $K$ and from $D$ onto $\\overline{E \\Theta}$ at $M$.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll also extend a perpendicular from $B$ onto $\\overline{E \\Theta}$ at $N$, extending it as far as $X$ where it meets a line created from $D$ that is parallel to $\\overline{E \\Theta}$, thus forming parallelogram $DMNX.$<\/p>\n<p>To get started, we&#8217;ll consider $\\angle AE \\Theta$. This is the apparent distance of the planet before apogee. We stated above that the planet was observed to be $300;20\u00ba$ after the apogee, which means that $\\angle AE \\Theta$ is a full circle minus this amount of $59;40\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, $\\angle AEL$ is the distance between the apogee and the mean sun from the point of view of the observer. Ptolemy has calculated this to be $2;43\u00ba$ for us.<\/p>\n<p>We can add these two angles together to determine $\\angle LE \\Theta = 62;23\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>Now, recall that $\\overline{LE} \\parallel \\overline{\\Theta B}$ because the angle of the planet about the epicycle is always equal to that of the mean sun from the point of view of the observer. This makes $\\angle E \\Theta B$ an alternate angle, giving it the same value as $\\angle LE \\Theta$ or $62;23\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>We can then focus on $\\triangle B\\Theta N,$ creating a dem-degrees circle about it. In it, the hypotenuse, $\\overline{B \\Theta} = 120^p$ and $arc \\; BN = 124;46\u00ba.$ The corresponding chord, then, $\\overline{BN} = 106;20^p.$<\/p>\n<p>Since we know the size of this (the radius of the epicycle) in the context in which the diameter of the eccentres is $120^p$, we can use that to convert:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\frac{11;30^p}{120^p} = \\frac{\\overline{BN}}{106;20^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{BN} = 10;11^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>Ptolemy rounds up to $10;12^p.$<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll now look at $\\triangle DEM$. In it, we know that $\\angle DEM = 59;40\u00ba$ which means that the remaining non-right angle, $\\angle MDE = 30;20\u00ba$. We&#8217;ll now create a demi-degrees context about this triangle in which the hypotenuse, $\\overline{DE} = 120^p$. Additionally $arc \\; DM = 119;20\u00ba.$ Thus, the corresponding chord, $\\overline{DM} = 103;34^p$.<\/p>\n<p>And since we know that $\\overline{DE} = 2;45^p$ in the context in which the diameters of the eccentres is $120^p$, we can convert to that context:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\frac{2;45^p}{120^p} = \\frac{\\overline{DM}}{103;34^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{DM} = 2;22^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>Ptolemy finds it to be $2;23^p.$<\/p>\n<p>Since $DMNX$ is a parallelogram, this is the same as $\\overline{NX}$ which we can add to $\\overline{BN}$ to find that $\\overline{BX} = 12;35^p.$<\/p>\n<p>Next, we can focus on $\\triangle BDX,$ creating a demi-degrees context about it wherein the hypotenuse $\\overline{BD} = 120^p.$ We can use this to convert into the demi-degrees context:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\frac{120^p}{60^p} = \\frac{\\overline{BX}}{12;35^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{BX} = 25;10^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>We can the find the corresponding arc, $arc \\; BX = 24;13\u00ba$ although Ptolemy finds it to be $24;14\u00ba.$ In either case, this means that the angle this arc subtends on the opposite side of the demi-degrees circle $\\angle BDX = 12;07\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>Next, take a look at $\\angle XDB$. This is a right angle. Thus, we can subtract $\\angle BDX$ out of it which gives us $\\angle BDM = 77;53\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>We can then add $\\angle MDE$ to find $\\angle BDE = 108;13\u00ba$.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll then find the supplementary angle to this along $\\overline{AG}$ to find $\\angle ADB = 71;47\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>Now we&#8217;ll focus on that skinny triangle, $\\triangle ZDK,$ creating a demi-degrees circle about it in which the hypotenuse, $\\overline{ZD} = 120^p.$<\/p>\n<p>In that, $arc \\; ZK = 143;34\u00ba$ and its supplement, $arc \\; DK = 36;26\u00ba.$ We can then find the corresponding chords, $\\overline{ZK} = 113;59^p$ and $\\overline{DK} = 37;31^p.$<\/p>\n<p>This can be converted into the context in which the diameter of the eccentres is $120^p$:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\frac{2;45^p}{120^p} = \\frac{\\overline{ZK}}{113;59^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{ZK} = 2;37^p$$<\/p>\n<p>and<\/p>\n<p>$$\\frac{2;45^p}{120^p} = \\frac{\\overline{DK}}{37;31^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{DK} = 0;52^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll then subtract $\\overline{DK}$ off of $\\overline{DB}$ to find that $\\overline{KB} = 59;08^p.$<\/p>\n<p>We can then focus on $\\triangle ZBK$ in which we know two of the sides. Thus, we can find the remaining side:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{ZB} = \\sqrt{59;08^2 + 2;37^2} = 59;11^p$$<\/p>\n<p>which Ptolemy rounds up to $59;12^p.$<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll now create a demi-degrees context about this triangle in which\u00a0 the hypotenuse, $\\overline{ZB} = 120^p.$ Converting into that context:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\frac{120^p}{59;12^p} = \\frac{\\overline{ZK}}{2;37^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{ZK} = 5;18^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>We can then find the corresponding arc $arc \\; ZK = 5;04\u00ba.$ Thus, the angle that this arc subtends on the opposite side of the circle, $\\angle ZBD = 2;32\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>If we add this to $\\angle ADB$ we find<\/p>\n<p>$$\\angle AZB = 71;47\u00ba + 2;32 = 74;19\u00ba.$$<\/p>\n<p>This next part is a bit hard to see, so let play with our diagram a bit.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4819\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?resize=235%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"235\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?resize=235%2C300&amp;ssl=1 235w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?resize=803%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 803w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?resize=768%2C980&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?resize=1204%2C1536&amp;ssl=1 1204w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?resize=1606%2C2048&amp;ssl=1 1606w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?w=1684&amp;ssl=1 1684w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/AlmagestFig-11.11-3.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 235px) 100vw, 235px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In this diagram, I&#8217;ve exaggerated the angles of $\\overline{LE}$ and since that&#8217;s parallel to $\\overline{\\Theta B},$ that as well.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve also extended $\\overline{HZ}$ until it hits $\\overline{LE}$, creating a new point at $T$ and I&#8217;ve created $\\overline{ES}$ which is parallel to $\\overline{ZH}$.<\/p>\n<p>Then, I&#8217;ve marked out the angles that are equal:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\angle LTZ = \\angle LES = \\angle \\Theta BH$$<\/p>\n<p>and<\/p>\n<p>$$\\angle AZH = \\angle AES.$$<\/p>\n<p>Now, let&#8217;s look at $\\angle LES$. This is quite clearly $\\angle LEA + \\angle AES$.<\/p>\n<p>However, due to the angles we just stated were equal, we can do some substituting to write:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\angle \\Theta BH = \\angle LEA + \\angle AZH.$$<\/p>\n<p>We know $\\angle LEA = 2;43\u00ba$ as this was the angle of the mean sun past apogee. We just found $\\angle AZH = 74;19\u00ba.$<\/p>\n<p>Thus, we can determine $\\angle \\Theta BH = 77;02\u00ba.$<span id='easy-footnote-2-4815' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/08\/almagest-book-xi-jupiters-periodic-motions\/#easy-footnote-bottom-2-4815' title='Toomer again notes that there have been some accumulated rounding errors. This time, they have largely cancelled out, but accurate computation would have given $77;00\u00ba.$'><sup>2<\/sup><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>This is the angle of Jupiter about its epicycle from the apogee of the epicycle.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>And we had [already] shown that, at the moment of the third opposition, its distance from the apogee of the epicycle was $182;47\u00ba.$ Thus, in the interval between the two observations, which comprises $377$ Egyptian years and $128$ days less approximately $1$ hour, its motion was $105;45\u00ba$ beyond $345$ complete revolutions.<\/p>\n<p>That is, again, very nearly the same increment in anomaly as one derives from the [tables for] mean motions which we constructed. For, it was from these very same elements that we derived the daily [mean motion in anomaly], by dividing the number of degrees contained in the complete revolutions plus the increment by the number of days contained in the time-interval.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Switching to decimal briefly, that&#8217;s a total increase of $124,305.75\u00ba$ in\u00a0$137,732.96$ days. Dividing that out, I get $0;54,09,02,45,08,48^{\\frac{\u00ba}{day}}.$<\/p>\n<p>So we can see that Ptolemy saying &#8220;very nearly&#8221; is again accurate as what he actually recorded in the mean motions table for the anomaly of Jupiter was $0;54,09,02,46,26,00^{\\frac{\u00ba}{day}}.$ The values match until the last three sexagesimal places which is still reasonably good agreement. But again, Ptolemy has clearly done something he hasn&#8217;t explained and, as Toomer puts it, &#8220;remains obscure.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Toomer again discusses this in Appendix C of his translation, but this is beyond the scope of what I&#8217;m intending with this blog. So I&#8217;ll close out here and, in the next post, we&#8217;ll determine the epoch positions for Jupiter.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Almagest-Progress-20240822.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4820\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Almagest-Progress-20240822.png?resize=300%2C130&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"130\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Almagest-Progress-20240822.png?resize=300%2C130&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Almagest-Progress-20240822.png?resize=1024%2C444&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Almagest-Progress-20240822.png?resize=768%2C333&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Almagest-Progress-20240822.png?resize=1536%2C666&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Almagest-Progress-20240822.png?w=1905&amp;ssl=1 1905w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before moving on, Ptolemy describes how he arrived at the periodic motions of Jupiter, beginning with an ancient observation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[24],"tags":[25,82,16,50,14],"class_list":["post-4815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-almagest","tag-almagest","tag-anomaly","tag-epicycle","tag-jupiter","tag-ptolemy"],"acf":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9ZpvC-1fF","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4815"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4815\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4823,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4815\/revisions\/4823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}