{"id":4639,"date":"2024-07-29T15:17:44","date_gmt":"2024-07-29T20:17:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/?p=4639"},"modified":"2024-07-29T19:32:41","modified_gmt":"2024-07-30T00:32:41","slug":"almagest-book-x-second-iteration-for-mars-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/07\/almagest-book-x-second-iteration-for-mars-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Almagest Book X: Second Iteration for Mars \u2013 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Continuing on with our second iteration in which we calculate the revised line of apsides and eccentricity of Mars&#8217; model.<\/p>\n<p>As with before, I&#8217;m doing my calculations in <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/spreadsheets\/d\/17xEf7I1YMl0yRzVpYHT50iFuSm-ChFrozJ4GgyhBXOc\/edit?usp=sharing\">a Google Sheet<\/a> to make it easier to correct should I make an error. This also means that the Sheet will be keeping much higher precision to prevent rounding errors. However, as I&#8217;m only showing rounded values, things may look a bit off. So if something seems funny, I encourage checking out the aforementioned Sheet.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Getting started, we&#8217;ll make use of the same diagram as we did the <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/03\/almagest-book-x-preliminary-determination-of-mars-apogee-eccentricity-part-2\/\">first time around<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4500\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?resize=269%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"269\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?resize=269%2C300&amp;ssl=1 269w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?resize=918%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 918w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?resize=768%2C857&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?resize=1377%2C1536&amp;ssl=1 1377w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?resize=1836%2C2048&amp;ssl=1 1836w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?w=1945&amp;ssl=1 1945w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AlmagestFig-10.9.jpg?w=1575&amp;ssl=1 1575w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 269px) 100vw, 269px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>From the previous post, we determined that $\\overline{GE} = 118;26^p$ and that $\\overline{ED} = 66;03^p$, both in the context in which $\\overline{LM} = 120^p$.<\/p>\n<p>We can then write<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{GD} = \\overline{GE} &#8211; \\overline{ED} = 118;26^p &#8211; 66;03^p$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{GD} = 52;23^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>Again, we can use the intersecting chords theorem to write<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{ED} \\cdot \\overline{GD} = \\overline{LD} \\cdot \\overline{DM}.$$<\/p>\n<p>We have the left hand side of this, so we&#8217;ll plug in:<\/p>\n<p>$$66;03^p \\cdot 52;23^p = \\overline{LD} \\cdot \\overline{DM}$$<\/p>\n<p>And then we&#8217;ll use Euclid&#8217;s II.5:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{LD} \\cdot \\overline{DM}\u00a0 = \\overline{LK}^2 &#8211; \\overline{DK}^2.$$<\/p>\n<p>Substituting in the left hand side of the equation:<\/p>\n<p>$$66;03^p \\cdot 52;23^p\u00a0= \\overline{LK}^2 &#8211; \\overline{DK}^2.$$<\/p>\n<p>And then plugging in $\\overline{LK} = 60^p$:<\/p>\n<p>$$66;03^p \\cdot 52;23^p = 3600 &#8211; \\overline{DK}^2$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{DK} = 11;50^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>This is the distance between the center of motion (the equant) and the observer and has gone down since the first iteration which was $13;07^p$.<\/p>\n<p>And good news, we&#8217;re on the right path here. Although Ptolemy didn&#8217;t show all the steps I&#8217;ve shown, he does confirm that for this first iteration, this was the value at which he arrived<span id='easy-footnote-1-4639' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/07\/almagest-book-x-second-iteration-for-mars-part-2\/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-4639' title='Neugebauer also lists values, but states that they are &amp;#8220;numerical data obtained by Ptolemy.&amp;#8221; I interpret this to mean that he is simply reporting Ptolemy&amp;#8217;s value and not his own calculations.'><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/span>. Toomer also arrived at this value.<\/p>\n<p>Next,<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{GN} = \\frac{1}{2} \\overline{GE} = \\frac{118;26^p}{2} = 59;13^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>We can then subtract $\\overline{GD}$ from this, which we previously showed to be $52;23^p$, leaving us with $\\overline{DN} = 6;50p$.<\/p>\n<p>This is a second part of right triangle, $\\triangle DKN$.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll then switch into a demi-degrees context about that triangle:<\/p>\n<p>$$\\frac{120^p}{11;50^p} = \\frac{\\overline{DN}}{6;50^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\overline{DN} = 69;17^p.$$<\/p>\n<p>Using a bit of trig to find $\\angle DKN$:<\/p>\n<p>$$sin(\\angle DKN) = \\frac{69;17^p}{120^p}$$<\/p>\n<p>$$\\angle DKN = 35;16\u00ba.$$<\/p>\n<p>This is the same measure as $arc \\; MX$.<\/p>\n<p>Jumping back to the <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/07\/almagest-book-x-second-iteration-for-mars\/\">last post<\/a>, we&#8217;d determined that $arc \\; GE = 161;27\u00ba$. Again, since $\\overline{KX}$ is perpendicular to chord $\\overline{GE}$ it bisects both the chord and the arc meaning that $arc \\; GMX = 80;44\u00ba$.<\/p>\n<p>We can subtract $arc \\; MX$ from this to determine:<\/p>\n<p>$$arc \\; GM = arc \\; GMX &#8211; arc \\; MX = 80;44\u00ba &#8211; 35;16\u00ba$$<\/p>\n<p>$$arc \\; GM = 45;28\u00ba.$$<\/p>\n<p>This gives us the amount prior to the line of apsides Mars was at the third observation.<\/p>\n<p>Toomer reports finding this same value. Ptolemy gives a value that is slightly different at $45;33\u00ba$. I suspect the difference is accumulated rounding errors and that he did not use a spreadsheet as I did.<\/p>\n<p>Next, we&#8217;ll find the values for the other two observations with respect to the line of apsides.<\/p>\n<p>Again, $arc \\; BG = 95;28\u00ba$.<\/p>\n<p>So we can look at $arc \\; LM$, which is $180\u00ba$ and subtract off $arc \\; GM$ and $arc \\; BG$:<\/p>\n<p>$$arc \\; LB = 180\u00ba &#8211; 45;28\u00ba &#8211; 95;28\u00ba = 39;04\u00ba.$$<\/p>\n<p>We also know that $arc \\; AB = 81;44$. So we can subtract off $arc \\; LB$ to find<\/p>\n<p>$$arc \\; AL = arc \\; AB &#8211; arc \\; LB = 81;44\u00ba &#8211; 39;04\u00ba$$<\/p>\n<p>$$arc \\; AL = 42;40\u00ba.$$<\/p>\n<p>Toomer does not report his values for these, but since they&#8217;re straightforward calculations, I have no doubt his numbers would match mine given the first of these three values did.<\/p>\n<p>With those values in hand, we&#8217;re ready to calculate the corrections for the three angles. And once that&#8217;s complete, we can go through one more iteration and finally be done with this!<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Almagest-Progress-20240729.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4656\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Almagest-Progress-20240729.png?resize=300%2C129&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"129\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Almagest-Progress-20240729.png?resize=300%2C129&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Almagest-Progress-20240729.png?resize=1024%2C439&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Almagest-Progress-20240729.png?resize=768%2C329&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Almagest-Progress-20240729.png?resize=1536%2C659&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Almagest-Progress-20240729.png?w=1916&amp;ssl=1 1916w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Continuing on with our second iteration in which we calculate the revised line of apsides and eccentricity of Mars&#8217; model. As with before, I&#8217;m doing my calculations in a Google Sheet to make it easier to correct should I make an error. This also means that the Sheet will be keeping much higher precision to &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2024\/07\/almagest-book-x-second-iteration-for-mars-part-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Almagest Book X: Second Iteration for Mars \u2013 Part 2&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[24],"tags":[80,17,6],"class_list":["post-4639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-almagest","tag-eccentricity","tag-equant","tag-mars"],"acf":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9ZpvC-1cP","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4639"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4661,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4639\/revisions\/4661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}