{"id":1686,"date":"2019-11-11T18:55:08","date_gmt":"2019-11-12T00:55:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/?p=1686"},"modified":"2020-07-19T15:52:27","modified_gmt":"2020-07-19T20:52:27","slug":"almagest-book-iii-on-the-anomaly-of-the-sun-difference-between-mean-and-anomalistic-motion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/11\/almagest-book-iii-on-the-anomaly-of-the-sun-difference-between-mean-and-anomalistic-motion\/","title":{"rendered":"Almagest Book III: On the Anomaly of the Sun \u2013 Difference Between Mean and Anomalistic Motion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/11\/almagest-book-iii-on-the-anomaly-of-the-sun-part-1\/\">last post<\/a>, we determined the basic properties of the eccentric model to predict the motion of the sun. Now, we&#8217;ll use these properties in conjunction with the model itself to be able to predict &#8220;the greatest difference between mean and anomalistic motions&#8221; by referring back to our original model.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>So let&#8217;s draw a simple diagram:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1687\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10.jpg?resize=281%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"281\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10.jpg?resize=281%2C300&amp;ssl=1 281w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10.jpg?w=638&amp;ssl=1 638w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 281px) 100vw, 281px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here, circle ABG is the eccentre on center D and the observer lies at E. The sun will be located at B where $\\overline{BE} \\perp \\overline{AG}$ at E since, as we <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/10\/almagest-book-iii-hypotheses-for-circular-motion-part-2\/\">showed a few posts ago<\/a>, this is where the equation of anomaly is greatest. Thus, our goal will be to determine $\\angle{DBE}$ as this is the angle between mean and anomalistic motion.<\/p>\n<p>In our <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/11\/almagest-book-iii-on-the-anomaly-of-the-sun-part-1\/\">last post<\/a>, we determined $\\overline{DE}$ to be 2;29:30 which Ptolemy now rounds off to 2;30. The length of $\\overline{BD}$ is 60 as it&#8217;s the radius of one of Ptolemy&#8217;s circles. That&#8217;s all we need to solve this using the demi-degrees trick we&#8217;ve seen a few times now<span id='easy-footnote-1-1686' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/11\/almagest-book-iii-on-the-anomaly-of-the-sun-difference-between-mean-and-anomalistic-motion\/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-1686' title='If we were using modern math, this could easily be solved with the sine function, but given that wasn&amp;#8217;t developed until a few hundred years after Ptolemy, I&amp;#8217;m starting to feel like this is a pretty cool trick.'><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/span>. So we&#8217;ll draw in a circle around those points:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10a.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1688\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10a.jpg?resize=281%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"281\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10a.jpg?resize=281%2C300&amp;ssl=1 281w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10a.jpg?w=638&amp;ssl=1 638w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 281px) 100vw, 281px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This makes $\\overline{DE}$ a chord of $arc \\; DE$. However, we&#8217;ll need to convert the length of $\\overline{DE}$ in the context of the larger circle, to the context of the new circle.<\/p>\n<p>Previously, $\\overline{BD}$ had a length of 60. But as a diameter of the new circle, it&#8217;s now 120. That&#8217;s a scale factor of 2x. So we&#8217;ll need to scale $\\overline{DE}$ up by 2x as well, which means its new length is 5 units. From that, we can use the <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/index.php\/2018\/06\/03\/almagest-book-i-ptolemys-table-of-chords\/\">table of chords<\/a> to determine the length of $arc \\; DE \\approx 4;46\u00ba$, or as Ptolemy puts it, 4;46\u00ba\u00ba because that&#8217;s the angle at the center of the small circle, subtended by the arc. However, we&#8217;re looking for the one on the circumference which is half that, or 2;23\u00ba which is the greatest equation of anomaly.<\/p>\n<p>Now, where does that occur?<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s remove the small circle and draw in $\\overline{DZ}$ which is parallel to $\\overline{BE}$.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10b.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1689\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10b.jpg?resize=282%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"282\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10b.jpg?resize=282%2C300&amp;ssl=1 282w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-10b.jpg?w=641&amp;ssl=1 641w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 282px) 100vw, 282px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This means that point B is $\\angle{ADB}$ away from apogee. However, this angle is $\\angle{ADZ} + \\angle{BDZ}$. And that&#8217;s easy to find because $\\angle{ADZ} = 90\u00ba$ and $\\angle{BDZ} = \\angle{DBE} = 2;23\u00ba$<span id='easy-footnote-2-1686' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/11\/almagest-book-iii-on-the-anomaly-of-the-sun-difference-between-mean-and-anomalistic-motion\/#easy-footnote-bottom-2-1686' title='Since alternate interior angles are congruent.'><sup>2<\/sup><\/a><\/span>. Thus, $\\angle{ADB} = 92;23\u00ba$ away from apogee.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, based on the results we found in <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/11\/almagest-book-iii-hypotheses-for-circular-motion-similarities-in-apparent-apogee-and-perigee-distances\/\">this post<\/a>, the equation of anomaly directly across from E will also be equal. Thus, since point B is the greatest on the left semi-circle, the point directly opposite it will be equal and therefore the greatest there as well. However, it will occur 2;23\u00ba before the 270\u00ba mark<span id='easy-footnote-3-1686' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/11\/almagest-book-iii-on-the-anomaly-of-the-sun-difference-between-mean-and-anomalistic-motion\/#easy-footnote-bottom-3-1686' title='From the point of view of D. It&amp;#8217;s at the 270\u00ba mark for the observer at E.'><sup>3<\/sup><\/a><\/span>, so at 267;37\u00ba from the apogee (again going counter-clockwise).<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s all we really needed to show, but for good measure, Ptolemy decides to repeat the process for the epicyclic model just to drive home their equivalency.<\/p>\n<p>So let&#8217;s start with the basic model again:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11a.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1691\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11a.jpg?resize=246%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"246\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11a.jpg?resize=246%2C300&amp;ssl=1 246w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11a.jpg?w=736&amp;ssl=1 736w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 246px) 100vw, 246px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here, I&#8217;ve essentially reused the diagram from <a href=\"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/2019\/10\/almagest-book-iii-hypotheses-for-circular-motion-part-2\/\">this post<\/a>, but with a few points renamed and a few removed as they won&#8217;t be necessary. This diagram was used because it puts the sun at Z, which is 90\u00ba away from apogee at E&#8217;. As we showed in that post, this is again the point of the greatest equation of anomaly. So to demonstrate that this produces the same results as the other model, we&#8217;ll need to show the angle from apogee of the mean motion, $\\angle{A&#8217;DA}$ to be the same as what we found above for $\\angle{ADB}$ in the other diagram which was 2;23\u00ba.<\/p>\n<p>One of the requirements for the two hypotheses being equal is that their ratios be the same, so we&#8217;ll use $\\overline{AZ} = 2;30$. Again, we&#8217;ll use the demi-degrees method and draw a circle with the points of $\\triangle{ADZ}$ on its perimeter.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11b.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1692\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11b.jpg?resize=246%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"246\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11b.jpg?resize=246%2C300&amp;ssl=1 246w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/AlmagestFig3-11b.jpg?w=736&amp;ssl=1 736w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 246px) 100vw, 246px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the context of the deferent where $\\overline{AD} = 60$, $\\overline{AZ} = 2;30$ but since, in this new circle, ADZ, $\\overline{AD} = 120$, $\\overline{AZ}$ again equals 5. Using the same logic above of $arc \\;AZ = 4;46\u00ba$ from the chord table, the angle it subtends on the other circumference, $\\angle{ADZ}$, must again be half of that or 2;23\u00ba, which agrees with our previous result for the maximum of the equation of anomaly.<\/p>\n<p>And again, we can determine what angular distance this takes place from apogee by adding this angle to $\\angle A&#8217;DZ$ which is $90\u00ba + 2;23\u00ba = 92;23\u00ba$ which agrees with the previous model.<\/p>\n<p>That was a nice easy finish to chapter 4. In the next chapter, we&#8217;ll begin the process of constructing a table to determine the anomaly at numerous points in the sun&#8217;s path so we&#8217;ll have a handy reference instead of having to do the math every time we need to determine something.<\/p>\n<p>But before we go, here&#8217;s how today&#8217;s progress changes the progress report:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Almagest-Progress-11-11-19.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1695\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Almagest-Progress-11-11-19.png?resize=300%2C129&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"129\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Almagest-Progress-11-11-19.png?resize=300%2C129&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Almagest-Progress-11-11-19.png?resize=768%2C330&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Almagest-Progress-11-11-19.png?resize=1024%2C441&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Almagest-Progress-11-11-19.png?w=1304&amp;ssl=1 1304w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>So close to 20%!<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the last post, we determined the basic properties of the eccentric model to predict the motion of the sun. Now, we&#8217;ll use these properties in conjunction with the model itself to be able to predict &#8220;the greatest difference between mean and anomalistic motions&#8221; by referring back to our original model.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[24],"tags":[25,29,10,28,26,14],"class_list":["post-1686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-almagest","tag-almagest","tag-chords","tag-geocentrism","tag-geometry","tag-mathematics","tag-ptolemy"],"acf":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9ZpvC-rc","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1686"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1686\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2073,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1686\/revisions\/2073"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonvoisey.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}