Category: Almagest

Posted on

Almagest Book III: On the Epoch of the Sun’s Mean Motion

We’ve come a long way in this book establishing a working model for solar motion. In fact, we’ve explored two models and derived a table that shows how far the sun would be away from its mean motion based on the mean position. However, at this point, everything has been done in terms of apogee and perigee.

In this chapter, we’ll be defining the “epoch“. What that means is that Ptolemy is going to pick a point in time, and define where the sun was on that date. Then, applying the tools we have developed in this book, we’ll be able to determine where the sun is at any other given date using the epoch as the starting point. For those that like things in a bit more mathy terms, it’s the location of the sun on the eccentre at time = 0, wherein Ptolemy will decide what that date is. To get there, we’ll first establish precise point on the eccentre at a known point in time, and then use the methods from this chapter to go backwards until we get to the chosen epoch date. Continue reading “Almagest Book III: On the Epoch of the Sun’s Mean Motion”

Posted on

Almagest Book III: Equation of Anomaly from Perigee using Epicyclic Hypothesis

As the final post for this chapter, we’ll examine the equation of anomaly for angles measured from perigee in the epicyclic model. Again, we’ll start with a basic diagram for the epicyclic model and this time, we’ll drop a perpendicular onto $\overline{DA}$ from H to form $\overline{HK}$.

Continue reading “Almagest Book III: Equation of Anomaly from Perigee using Epicyclic Hypothesis”

Posted on

Almagest Book III: Equation of Anomaly from Perigee using Eccentric Hypothesis

In the past couple Almagest posts, we’ve demonstrated that you can derive the equation of anomaly if you know the angle from apogee of either the mean or apparent motion using either the eccentric or epicyclic hypothesis1. Now, we’ll do the same using the angular distance from perigee again using 30º as our example. Continue reading “Almagest Book III: Equation of Anomaly from Perigee using Eccentric Hypothesis”

Posted on

Almagest Book III: Equation of Anomaly from Apogee using Epicyclic Hypothesis

Despite Ptolemy demonstrating the equivalence of the eccentric and epicyclic hypotheses many times now, he sets out to prove that we can arrive at the same equation of anomaly using the epicyclic hypothesis as we do the eccentric. As we did for the eccentric, we’ll again use the case when the mean motion is 30º from apogee. Continue reading “Almagest Book III: Equation of Anomaly from Apogee using Epicyclic Hypothesis”

Posted on

Almagest Book III: On the Anomaly of the Sun – Difference Between Mean and Anomalistic Motion

In the last post, we determined the basic properties of the eccentric model to predict the motion of the sun. Now, we’ll use these properties in conjunction with the model itself to be able to predict “the greatest difference between mean and anomalistic motions” by referring back to our original model. Continue reading “Almagest Book III: On the Anomaly of the Sun – Difference Between Mean and Anomalistic Motion”

Posted on

Almagest Book III: On the Anomaly of the Sun – Basic Parameters

Now that we’ve laid out how the two hypotheses work and explored how they sometimes function similarly, it’s time to use one of them for the sun. But which one? Or do we need both?

For the sun, Ptolemy states that the sun has

a single anomaly, of such a kind that the time taken from least speed to mean shall always be greater than the time from mean speed to greatest.

In other words, the sun fits both models, but only requires one. Ptolemy chooses the eccentric model due to its simplicity.

But now it’s time to take the hypothesis from a simple toy, in which we’ve just shown the basic properties, and to start attaching hard numbers to it to make it a predictive model. To that end, Ptolemy states,

Our first task is to find the ratio of the eccentricity of the sun’s circle, that is, the ratio of which the distance between the center of the eccentre and the center of the ecliptic (located at the observer) bears to the radius of the eccentre.

Continue reading “Almagest Book III: On the Anomaly of the Sun – Basic Parameters”

Posted on

Almagest Book III: Hypotheses for Circular Motion – Similarities in Apparent Apogee and Perigee Distances

The last symmetry between the two models Ptolemy wants to point out is that,

where the apparent distance of the body from apogee [at one moment] equals its apparent distance from perigee [at another], the equation of anomaly will be the same at both positions.

Fortunately, the proofs for this are quite simple. Continue reading “Almagest Book III: Hypotheses for Circular Motion – Similarities in Apparent Apogee and Perigee Distances”

Posted on

Almagest Book III: Hypotheses for Circular Motion – Similarities in the Equation of the Anomaly

So far in this chapter, we’ve been looking at the two different hypotheses to explain the non-constant angular motion of objects in the sky. Ptolemy claimed that these were equivalent under certain circumstances and, in the last post, we showed how they do indeed produce the same results in the specific case of the object travelling 90º in apparent motion from apogee2 and that it always takes longer for the object to go from slowest motion to mean, than it does mean to fastest.

But that’s not really a full demonstration that they’re functionally the same. So in this post, we’ll show that their apparent angular position from the mean (known as the equation of the anomaly) is always the same, so long as there’s a few things that are consistent between models. Continue reading “Almagest Book III: Hypotheses for Circular Motion – Similarities in the Equation of the Anomaly”