Now that we’ve created our table of conjunctions and oppositions, how do we go about using it? As usual, Ptolemy walks through the process in a vacuum, so to help, I’ll follow along with the example Neugebauer does in History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy on pages $123-124$, although somewhat slimmed down. In particular, I’ll walk through finding the true opposition from the year $718$ in the epoch for the first opposition in the year. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: How to Determine the Mean and True Syzygies”
Almagest Book VI: Table of Mean Syzygies
Now that we’ve walked through how it’s calculated, here is Ptolemy’s Table of Mean Syzygies. As with previous tables, I’ve made this into a Google Sheet. I’ve also broken it into tabs to make the formatting easier since the first section has two tables and gives actual positions whereas the ones for years and months gives increments.
Almagest Book VI: Construction of the Table of Mean Syzygies
As promised in the last chapter, Ptolemy’s first task in eclipse prediction is going to be laying out a table of mean syzygies around which eclipses might be possible, so we can check those to see if an eclipse might occur instead of performing useless calculations where the sun and moon are nowhere near a syzygy. In this post, we’ll go over the construction of that table! Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Construction of the Table of Mean Syzygies”
Almagest Book VI: On Conjunctions and Oppositions of Sun and Moon
Finally we’re on Book VI. So far in the Almagest, we’ve had a few books which laid out some preliminary tables and concepts, a book on the sun, and two on the moon1. Now it’s time to put the sun and the moon together to start looking at some of the most dramatic astronomical phenomena: eclipses. To introduce this topic, Ptolemy begins with an uncharacteristically short chapter which is a single paragraph. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: On Conjunctions and Oppositions of Sun and Moon”
Almagest Book V: Components of Parallax – Correction Example
Now that Ptolemy has straightened us out regarding which angle we need to be using, Ptolemy sets out
a convention method for making the above kind of correction of the angles and arcs, if anyone wants to make it when the [differences] involved are so small.
Fortunately, we can use the same diagram we ended with last time which was the generic case:
Ptolemy lays his method on us in his familiar brick of text: Continue reading “Almagest Book V: Components of Parallax – Correction Example”
Almagest Book V: Components of Parallax – Corrections
At the end of the last post, we noted that Ptolemy wasn’t quite satisfied with what we did previously because we used some rather faulty assumptions.
As Ptolemy states it:
For lunar parallaxes, we considered it sufficient to use the arcs and angles formed by the great circle through the poles of the horizon [i.e., an altitude circle] at the ecliptic, instead of those at the moon’s inclined circle. For we saw that the difference which would result at syzygies in which eclipses occur is imperceptible, and to set out the latter would have been complicated to demonstrate and laborious to calculate; for the distance of the moon from the node is not fixed for a given position of the moon on the ecliptic, but undergoes multiple changes in both the amount and relative position.
The key phrase here is the “at the ecliptic, instead of the moon’s inclined circle.” This got swept under the rug in that post because Ptolemy didn’t really explain why the algorithm he gave us should work. So to understand, let’s start by taking a harder look at what’s actually going on.
Continue reading “Almagest Book V: Components of Parallax – Corrections”
Almagest Book V: Components of Parallax – A First Approximation
So far in this chapter, we’ve explored how to use the table of parallax to calculate the parallax of the moon and sun by knowing its distance from the zenith. But this in and of itself isn’t particularly useful. For example, when we did a sample lunar parallax calculation, we determined in that situation, the moon was about $1;10º$ off from its true position. But $1;10º$ in which direction?
Thus, the next step will be to break that down into its components, determining how far off in both ecliptic latitude and longitude the parallax makes the moon appear. Ptolemy again gives steps, but no example, so we’ll continue the previous example we did for the moon, following Neugebauer2. Continue reading “Almagest Book V: Components of Parallax – A First Approximation”
Almagest Book V: Calculating Solar Parallax Along a Great Circle Through the Zenith
Having computed the lunar parallax,
the sun’s parallax for a similar situation [i.e., as measured along an altitude circle] is immediately determined, in a simple fashion (for solar eclipses) from the number in the second column corresponding to the size of the arc from the zenith [to the sun].
Well that sure sounds easy. Let’s look at a quick example. Continue reading “Almagest Book V: Calculating Solar Parallax Along a Great Circle Through the Zenith”
Almagest Book V: Calculating Lunar Parallax Along Great Circle Through Zenith
Now that we’ve completed the parallax table, we should discuss how to use it. As usual, Ptolemy will now walk us through the steps, but does not provide an explicit example so I’ll follow an example from Neugebauer3, to help illustrate the procedure.
As our goal, Ptolemy states that our goal is to find
the moon’s parallax at any given position, (first) with respect to the great circle drawn through the moon and zenith
Continue reading “Almagest Book V: Calculating Lunar Parallax Along Great Circle Through Zenith”
Almagest Book V: Parallax Table
In the previous chapter, we worked out the parallax for the sun and the moon at 4 different positions. Next, we determined how we might make some corrections for the moon if it were between the positions we described, breaking the corrections into ones for the epicycle and for the eccentre. From that work, Chapter $18$ presents the results in tabular format. Since this one is pretty wide, I’ve again made the decision to put it into a Google Sheet.
