Category: Almagest

Posted on

Almagest Book VI: Lunar Eclipses Separated by Seven Months

So far in this chapter, we’ve demonstrated that it’s quite possible that, if either a solar or lunar eclipse occurs, there will be another one six months later. Then, in the last post we showed that, if a lunar eclipse happens, it’s possible (although unlikely) that there can be another one five months later. In this post, we’ll explore whether or not, for lunar eclipses, you can have two separated by seven months.

The procedure will be the same as in the last post. First we’ll determine the motion of the luminaries, taking into account the discrepancies due to the anomalies, as well as the differences between mean and true syzygy, and then compare those to the eclipse windows which we’ll again recalculate for this situation. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Lunar Eclipses Separated by Seven Months”

Posted on

Almagest Book VI: Lunar Eclipses Separated by Five Months

In the previous post, we showed that , if a solar or lunar eclipse occurs, it is possible that another may occur six months later. Now, we’ll turn to ask whether or not another lunar eclipse can happen five months after a previous one. To answer this question, we’ll first work out how much the moon would have moved in that time period and then compare that to the eclipse window.. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Lunar Eclipses Separated by Five Months”

Posted on

Almagest Book VI: Solar and Lunar Eclipses Separated by Six Months

Continuing in the theme of checking as few as possible syzygies for eclipses, Ptolemy now turns his attention towards

the problem of intervals at which, in general, it is possible for ecliptic syzygies to occur, so that, once we have determined a single example of of an ecliptic syzygy, we need not apply our examination to the [ecliptic] limits to every succeeding syzygy in turn, but only to those which are separated [from the first] by an interval of months at which it is possible for an eclipse to recur.

Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Solar and Lunar Eclipses Separated by Six Months”

Posted on

Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Latitudinal Parallax: Alternate Method

When writing the post on finding the latitudinal parallax as part of determining the limits for eclipses, I commented in a footnote that I’d developed a different method for determining this. While Ptolemy’s methods are reasonably accurate, I figured I should go ahead and share the one I came up with using the first case (when the sun is at the summer solstice and the moon is south of the ecliptic from Meroe) as an example. To do so, let’s consider again the configuration of the sun and moon in that instance.

Continue reading “Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Latitudinal Parallax: Alternate Method”

Posted on

Almagest Book VI: Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Solar & Lunar Anomalies

So far, when considering the distance the sun/moon can be from one of the nodes, we’ve worked out how much the longitudinal and latitudinal parallax impact things and all that’s left now is the fact that the sun and moon aren’t always at their mean position. They both have anomalies which we’ll need to consider. This is because the big goal of this book, so far, is to reduce the amount of math we have to do when checking for an eclipse. While we could go through all the effort of calculating the true position, that’s extra steps. Wouldn’t it be nicer if we could just stop at the mean position if it’s not in the window in which an eclipse can occur?

To that end, our final step in this series of posts exploring the limits for solar eclipses is to translate the true positions to the mean positions.

Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Solar & Lunar Anomalies”

Posted on

Almagest Book VI: Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Longitudinal Parallax

Now that we’ve determined how much further from the nodes parallax can cause solar eclipses to occur due to the latitudinal parallax, we need to consider the longitudinal effect. As with the last post, Ptolemy is absolutely no help in this. He simply tosses out some values with no explanation or work stating

When [the latitudinal] parallax is $0;08º$ northwards1, [the moon] has a maximum longitudinal parallax of about $0;30º$ … and when its [latitudinal] parallax is $0;58º$ southwards2, it has a maximum longitudinal parallax of about $0;15º$…

Seeking some assistance, I again refer to Neugebauer and Pappus, but immediately run into an issue. Neugebauer minces no words and states

Ptolemy is wrong in stating that $p_\lambda = 0;30º$ and $p_\lambda = 0;15º$ are the greatest longitudinal components of the parallax for locations between Meroe and the Borysthenes. It is difficult to explain how he arrived at this result.

Well… this will be interesting to try to untangle then. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Longitudinal Parallax”

Posted on

Almagest Book VI: Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Latitudinal Parallax

Now that we’ve determined how far away from the nodes a lunar eclipse can occur, we’ll work on doing the same for a solar eclipse3. But before diving in, I want to say that this has been one of the most, if not the most challenging section of the the Almagest so far. One of the primary reasons is that Ptolemy shows no work and gives almost no explanation on how he did this. When such things happen, I often turn to Neugebauer’s History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy which I did in this case. There, Neugebauer refers to Pappus of Alexandria, a fourth century mathematician who did commentary on the Almagest and walks through a process that arrives at the same values as Ptolemy.

However, there was a very large amount to unpack in just a few pages there and, unlike most cases where I can simply work along with it and see where things are going, this time I had to really understand the whole process before the first steps made any sense. This led me to agonize over what was going on with those first steps, amounting to several days of effort and rewriting this post from scratch several times. The result is twofold. First because I feel this section can only be approached by understanding the methodology before diving into the math, there’s going to be far more exposition than normal and, as a result, this is likely to be one of my longer posts. Second, the struggles I had with trying to understand the method and rewriting this post so many times has left me with a lot of fragments of thoughts in my brain and in the blog editor. I’ve done my best to clean it up, and maybe it’s just those thoughts swirling around in my brain, but this post just doesn’t feel as coherent as I like. Apologies in advance if you struggle to follow. Know I did as well.

Anyway, moving on to the topic at hand.

Normally, I like to start with a quote from Ptolemy to give us some direction, but I think Ptolemy did such a poor job of laying this section out, I’m going to avoid doing so for the majority of the post. Instead, let’s try to understand the process by recalling what we did with the moon and discussing how things will change. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Eclipse Limits for Solar Eclipses – Latitudinal Parallax”

Posted on

Mean to True Conjunction Alternate Method

In our last post, we walked through Ptolemy’s method for finding the angular distance between the mean and true conjunction.

When I initially wrote the post, I followed Neugebauer’s explanation as Ptolemy’s was quite difficult to parse and although they contain a lot of the same key elements, one important piece is left out of Neugebauer’s solution. Specifically, the part where Ptolemy’s iterative method leads naturally to the increase over the anomaly of $\frac{1}{12}$. Writing a later post, I realized that this was an important piece of information since it pops up later and thus made the effort to more completely understand Ptolemy’s method and rewrote the post to explain it. However, I didn’t want to lose the original work, following Neugebauer since readers may appreciate some explanation of Neugebauer’s work as it too is quite dense. Thus, I’ve included that original text beneath the fold as a separate post. Continue reading “Mean to True Conjunction Alternate Method”

Posted on

Almagest Book VI – Lunar Eclipse Limits

Way back in Book V we determined the angular diameter of the moon as well as earth’s shadow at apogee. In the last post, we repeated the procedure for perigee. In the Almagest, Ptolemy doesn’t actually say what those calculations are for and instead, starts working out some figures for the sun. However, to try to keep things in a more reasonable flow (in my opinion), I’m going to skip to the end of this chapter and discuss why we care about the moon’s diameter and earth’s shadow.

In short, lunar eclipses can only happen near the lunar nodes. But, it doesn’t have to be exactly at a node. First off, the earth’s shadow has some width to it. In addition, the anomalies of the sun and moon play a role, which means the actual range the eclipse could occur in is surprisingly wide. So in this post, we’ll work on that. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI – Lunar Eclipse Limits”

Posted on

Almagest Book VI: Lunar Diameter and Earth’s Shadow at Perigee During Syzygy

In the last post, we explored how to make use of the table of mean syzygies to calculate the true syzygies. However, that chapter focused mostly on finding the time when the moon and sun would have either the same or exactly opposite ecliptic latitude. But what got left by the wayside was the lunar ecliptic latitude. We did a bit of work on calculating the argument of it but, aside from my mention of it in the afterword of the post, we never really completed that calculation. And eclipses of either type cannot truly occur unless the lunar ecliptic latitude is reasonably close to zero.

So we could calculate the ecliptic latitude of the moon for every conjunction and opposition but instead, Ptolemy decides we should first do a bit of a sanity check before getting any more involved. To do so, Ptolemy wants to examine how far from a node is it even possible for the ecliptic longitude of the syzygy to occur and still have an eclipse. If it’s outside of these limits, then no further calculation is necessary. To do this, Ptolemy is going to need to know some additional values. In this post, we’ll explore the angular diameter when the moon is at the perigee of its epicycle at syzygy4 as well as determining the width of Earth’s shadow at that distance. Continue reading “Almagest Book VI: Lunar Diameter and Earth’s Shadow at Perigee During Syzygy”